Hello Sergei,
I've been trying to figure out what exactly is causing some layers to disregard the colorscheme and haven't come up with anything definitive. I was able to get a different byte type raster to display by calculating statistics on it, but that didn't work for my original byte type raster.
So in the attached zip...
landcover.tif is a byte type raster that uses the colorscheme
topock1_ycra_breeding_138.600.tif is a byte type without stats that fails to use it.
topock1_ycra_breeding_138.600_wstats.tif is a byte type with stats that fails to use it
and topock1_ycra_breeding_138.600_32bfloat.tif is the same layer converted to a float that does display correctly.
If the attachment gets stripped I also moved a copy here: https://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/554b940ae4b082ec54127219
Thanks for any insight!
Colin
I've been trying to figure out what exactly is causing some layers to disregard the colorscheme and haven't come up with anything definitive. I was able to get a different byte type raster to display by calculating statistics on it, but that didn't work for my original byte type raster.
So in the attached zip...
landcover.tif is a byte type raster that uses the colorscheme
topock1_ycra_breeding_138.600.tif is a byte type without stats that fails to use it.
topock1_ycra_breeding_138.600_wstats.tif is a byte type with stats that fails to use it
and topock1_ycra_breeding_138.600_32bfloat.tif is the same layer converted to a float that does display correctly.
If the attachment gets stripped I also moved a copy here: https://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/554b940ae4b082ec54127219
Thanks for any insight!
Colin